- Gpg suite big sur for mac#
- Gpg suite big sur zip file#
- Gpg suite big sur portable#
- Gpg suite big sur software#
Gpg suite big sur portable#
This time I wanted to solve the portable build problem since I needed to use it in different computers and VMs. Maybe we could with some Python hacks together with calling system APIs but that’s ugly and not fun. The debug registers aren’t directly available in lldb so we can’t display and modify them. This week I needed once again to add a feature to lldb. Some time ago I tried to fix it but I gave up since I wasn’t in the mood to deal with build systems problems. The build process described in that post worked but I wasn’t very happy with it - not easily portable between macOS systems.
Gpg suite big sur software#
Probably because lldb main users are developers and not serious reverse engineers (lol!) dealing with malicious code and/or just reversing/cracking hostile software protections (cracking is the best and most fun RE target practice). This critical debugger feature was missing from lldb. It is not encrypted using the Zip’s own encryption, because the zipinfo tool would show the table of contents for such an archive, only requiring a password to extract the contained files.Almost two years ago (when covid was just starting and we all happily ignored it) I wrote a post about implementing x86 hardware breakpoints in lldb. I don’t know what Microsoft is doing, but I think it is reasonable to assume that it is still a zip file, but one that they encrypted after creation. Zipinfo: cannot find zipfile directory in one of bar.docx orīar.docx.zip, and cannot find, period. Latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on Either this file is notĪ zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. If you try the same with a password protected document, the zip tools fail: $ zipinfo bar.docxĮnd-of-central-directory signature not found.
Gpg suite big sur zip file#
Zip file size: 17020 bytes, number of entries: 11
You can actually view the contents using standard zip tools.
Gpg suite big sur for mac#
I have been unable to find out whether password protection in Office for Mac encrypts the file or just requires a password to open. I’m just curious if either of these are still problems today. The second reason I stopped using disk images is I started using syncing services like Dropbox so that my projects were on multiple devices and every tiny change to a file in a disk image required the entire disk image to by synced, which wasted a lot of bandwidth and was slow. (At least with regular files you might only lose one file or be able to extract partial data from a file.) But unlike regular files, if an encrypted disk image won’t open, the data is toast. This might have been due to OS upgrades and trying to open an image I hadn’t opened in a while, so it could have been an OS compatibility problem. One reason I stopped was that I ran into times where the OS would tell me a disk image was corrupt and wouldn’t open. I used to do this sort of thing (storing different projects on disk images to keep them more organized), but it was a long time ago. Has anyone had issues with disk images becoming corrupt? Another vote for using an encrypted disk image
0 kommentar(er)
